Infrastructure
Cloud and On-Premise
Blobb is not a cloud vendor and does not assume the answer is cloud. The work compares cloud, owned, hybrid, and multi-datacenter options on cost and operational reality.
When businesses engage Blobb for this
- The infrastructure bill grows faster than usage or revenue
- Commitments and discounts hide the system’s real unit cost
- A migration was proposed before the current estate was measured
- Repatriation is discussed as a slogan rather than a commercial model
What the work involves
Blobb models current cost, future load, purchasing commitments, and operational effort. Cloud and on-premise options are compared on the same time horizon. Migration is planned in either direction, including hybrid and multi-datacenter designs. Recommendations are independent because Blobb holds no vendor margin.
What you get
- A normalized infrastructure cost model
- Break-even points for credible options
- A commitment and lock-in review
- A migration or repatriation sequence
- Operating requirements for the target model
How it is engaged
Before scoping a migration, Blobb usually recommends reviewing the current estate and the commercial assumptions behind it. This can be a full architecture audit or a focused review of the infrastructure decision.
Related work: architecture, legacy systems, IaaS and DBaaS, and the infrastructure audit case study.